Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CINDER LAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CINDER LAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CINDER LAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CINDER LAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CINDER LAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CINDER LAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CINDER LAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CINDER LAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CINDER LAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CINDER LAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CINDER LAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

This figure is not available.

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CINDER LAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kana'a-Cinder land complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes2673725742312r07yaz6931:24000
Kana'a-Cinder land complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes2512425742362r083az6931:24000
Vitrandepts-Cinder land complex, 15 to 75 percent slopes241674459644hf97ca03319851:24000
Cinder land1083540470329hsdxca70219841:24000
Cinder land-Sierraville-Kyburz complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesCIF741464621hlgsca71919821:24000
Vitrandic Torripsamments-Cinder land association, 15 to 50 percent slopes343bo6023908192l7v6ca76319841:24000
Cinder land200155188377721770ca78920091:24000
Vitrandic Torripsamments-Cinder land association, 15 to 50 percent slopes3431014488305jd3sca80219961:24000
Cinder land, 2 to 20 percent slopes15217123718922km4nhi70120081:24000
Cinder land, 20 to 40 percent slopes1632923718932km4phi70120081:24000
Lava flows-Cinder land complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes, MLRA 161A82102423717772km0yhi80120121:24000
Cinder land, 20 to 40 percent slopes16766723712192klfyhi80120121:24000
Cinder land, 2 to 20 percent slopes15224323712182klfxhi80120121:24000
Cinder landrCI7106468365hqckhi98019681:24000
Lava flows-Cinder land complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes, MLRA 161A8464031720642km0yhi98019681:24000
Cinder landrCI434468530hqjwhi99019661:24000
Cinder land3018525195522r00id68520121:24000
Cinder land-Northcrater association, 2 to 50 percent slopes7622789042n39id78019981:24000
Vitrandic Ustorthents-Cinder land complex, 15 to 35 percent12816952833616hv31mp64620021:24000
Cinder land, `a`a lava substratum-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 125 percent slopes1209472833608hv3vmp64620021:24000
Cinder land-Rock outcrop-Vitrandic Ustorthents complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes1216392833609hv3wmp64620021:24000
Shomushon-Cinder land complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1425592911430hv4jmp64620021:24000
Cinder land-Rock outcrop-Vitrandic Ustorthents complex, 35 to 100 percent slopes1224572833610hv3xmp64620021:24000
Rock outcrop, tuff escarpments-Cinder land complex, 45 to 150 percent slopes1394192833627hv4dmp64620021:24000
Cinder land, 15 to 45 percent slopes1143752833602hv3nmp64620021:24000
Cinder land, `a`a lava substratum-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1193402833607hv3tmp64620021:24000
Vitrandic Ustorthents-Cinder land complex, 35 to 100 percent1292662833617hv1dmp64620021:24000
Cinder land, tuff substrate, 15 to 60 percent slopes1172482833605hv3rmp64620021:24000
Shomushon-Cinder land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes1411562833629hv4gmp64620021:24000
Cinder land complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes1181422833606hv3smp64620021:24000
Cinder land, 0 to 8 percent slopes1131322833601hv3mmp64620021:24000
Cinder land, tuff substrate, 3 to 15 percent slopes116712833604hv3qmp64620021:24000
Bandera associationBA1586507713k19vnm00719741:24000
Bandera associationBd21113031437dmtmnm05919721:24000
Redcone-Cinder land complex, 30 to 60 percent south slopes451150628227p2qdor68220011:24000
Cinder land12408031838362whr4ut6171:24000
Cinder land350858483875j7hwut63419971:24000
Cinder landCI3600484727j8dcut64119711:24000
Cinder land, 0 to 90 percent slopes9630860822wkvwa67620141:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CINDER LAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .